WebThe Supreme Court has upheld section 203 of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act ("BCRA"), which says that corporations cannot use money from their general treasuries to finance express advocacy of a political candidate or its "functional equivalent." , "Functional equivalent" has been defined as a communication that could reasonably be interpreted … WebCitizens United v. Federal Election Commission is the 2010 Supreme Court case that held that the free speech clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government from …

Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 Wex US Law

WebThe BCRA was a content-based restriction that limited the political speech of companies and unions in a way that was not permitted by the First Amendment, according to the … WebMar 20, 2024 · In 2002, Congress passed the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), widely known as the McCain-Feingold Act, after its original sponsors, Senators John McCain of Arizona and Russ... flirting captions for instagram

Electioneering The First Amendment Encyclopedia

WebThe Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA) established additional campaign contribution and spending rules in federal elections and set new standards for … WebSection 304 of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA) restricts the use of post-election contributions by limiting the amount that a candidate may be repaid from such funds to ... campaign may use pre-election funds to repay the portion exceeding $250,000 only if the repayment occurs “within 20 days of the election.” WebFrom the beginning, the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA) was a constitutional train wreck. It was the “most significant abridgment of the freedoms of speech and association since the Civil War.” McConnell, 540 U.S. at 264 (opinion of Thomas, J.). In fact, even as he signed BCRA into law, President George W. Bush recognized that its great father poems